6 Reasons Why “Ran” Is Akira Kurosawa’s Late Masterpiece

Akira Kurosawa’s last epic was probably the most notorious entry in his vast filmography, since it was the most expensive Japanese film ever produced up to that point, with a budget of $11 million. It was also almost dropped for lack of funding, and the 75-year-old master lost his wife during the shoot, in an event that only stopped him for a day.

Eventually, and after many ‘skirmishes’ with the Japanese film industry, it received Oscar nominations for art direction, cinematography, costume design (which it won), and Kurosawa’s direction, after a campaign started by Sidney Lumet. It is currently considered one of the greatest films ever made.

Here are six reasons that justify the aforementioned. Please note that the article contains many spoilers.


1. Script that transcends the concept of adaptation

In feudal Japan, Lord Ichimonji decides to divide his realm among his three sons. Taro, the eldest, will receive the prestigious First Castle and become leader of the Ichimonji clan, while Jiro and Saburo will be given the Second and Third Castles. Hidetora is to retain the title of Great Lord and Jiro and Saburo are to support Taro.

His youngest son is against this decision, stating the obvious – that the three brothers have a thirst for power and their cooperation is almost impossible. Lord Ichimonji, however, considers his words an insult and banishes him, instigating a chain of events that results in a great war and his demise.

In that fashion, Taro, who has all the power in his hands as the leader of the clan, is proven worthless; he scorns his father and sends him away and forces Jiro to do the same. The catastrophe is completed when the two brothers kill each other.

Lord Ichimonji realizes his part in the drama and he loses his mind, but Saburo comes to his rescue. The one he deemed a traitor is the one who actually saves him.

Kurosawa was influenced by the William Shakespeare’s play “King Lear” and borrowed elements from it. The common elements are:

1.The aging lord who decides to divide his kingdom among his three sons and banishes anyone who disagrees with him.
2.The two children that turn against him, with the third supporting him.
3.Both stories end with the death of the entire family, including the lord.

The bigotry and the futility of authority is the main theme of “Ran”. Family members end up killing each other for the throne, and family relations exist only in theory, since Machiavelli’s dogma is the one that dictates every action, erasing any kind of respect or sentiment.

Kurosawa based his film on “King Lear” since the message he wanted to communicate about authority was eloquently portrayed in Shakespeare’s play. The fact that this message transcends time and ethnicity becomes evident through the adaptation of a 17th century play in the 1980s, and the appeal Kurosawa’s film eventually had on audiences.

However, “Ran” is not just an adaptation of the messages of “King Lear” in Japanese terms. On the contrary, Kurosawa makes a pointed critique toward the emperor’s authority in Japan, which, according to him, was the main reason for the way World War II ended for Japan and the consequences it had in Japanese society. In the 80s, the memory and the impact of the atomic bomb were still quite visible in Japanese society, and had resulted in a nihilistic and chaotic state of mind for many people.

However, Kurosawa does not offer a solution, but instead aims in reminding the facts and the ailments of absolute authority, in order to help people think and to avoid making the same mistakes again in the future.


2. Very meaningful characters, portrayed imperviously by the cast

Kurosawa’s tendency to present women in a very interesting light finds one of its apogees in “Ran”. Lady Kaede is the strongest female presence in the film, despite the fact that she remains a villain throughout the duration of the movie, and the fact that her actions all derive from her need for revenge against the Ichimonji clan, which Kurosawa justifies, at least to a point.

Kaede’s character was based on the tradition of Noh Theatre, which did not focus on reality but rather fiction, and in that fashion, is one of the less realistic in historic terms, since the power she has was utterly uncommon for the era. Mieko Harada plays the part to perfection, in a role filled with extreme theatricality and a single-mindedness for revenge to the point where she shows nothing else throughout the film.

To the direct opposite is the character of Lady Sue, whose presentation from Yoshiko Miyazaki makes an appealing character, particularly after her death. Both main females die, but the feelings deriving from their deaths are opposite, as Lady Kaede seems to have found vindication through the family’s fate, and Lady Sue forgiveness, thus making her death more tragic.

In a rather original character for Kurosawa, Shinnosuke “Peter” Ikehata plays the court jester, a comical figure who ends up being Hidetora’s last surviving servant. Despite the entertainment the character offers through his occasionally crude jokes and shenanigans, he also signifies the demise of his lord, who is left with none but a jester, the only character Hidetora actually saved.

No discussion regarding the acting in “Ran” would be complete without mentioning Tatsuya Nakadai’s sublime performance as Lord Ichimonji. In the second role of the film influenced by Noh Theatre, Nakadai wears a mask resembling the ones used in the particular theatre, while his body stances also move toward this direction.

Through this technique and his abilities as an actor, Nakadai actually becomes Hidetora, perfectly presenting the lord’s declining psychological situation, from a dominant man emitting power, to one disillusioned about his mistakes, to a lunatic.


3. Masterful cinematography through the use of telephoto lenses and static cameras

In another audiovisual poem by the Japanese master, “Ran” features astonishing cinematography through the techniques of Kurosawa and Asakazu Nakai, Takao Saito and Shoji Ueda, and the refinement of everything the director had learned during his shooting of “Kagemusha”. In that fashion, the crew used several static cameras to film the action, with Kurosawa cutting between them in a tactic that results in the viewer feeling not as a participant, but as a deity looking at the events from afar, before taking a close-up look.

The way the scenery is shot is truly magnificent, but the three cinematographers proved that great cinematography is much more than a beautiful setting. To the contrary, the impervious framing and the flat-out imagery, with telephoto lenses, allowed them to present images that transformed reality into Japanese paintings depicting the world in which the film takes place.

This technique makes the objects and the characters on screen seem closer together, and gives a claustrophobic sense to the various scenes, as exemplified in the introductory ones in the mountains. Furthermore, it communicates to the audience the tension and uneasiness this closeness brings to the protagonists, transmitting the same feeling to those watching the movie.


4. The scene during the end of the film, when the blind Tsurumaru walks to the edge of a large cliff

Kurosawa has isolated the young man as he moves toward the precipice, almost falling over. The camera, however, shows the audience what Tsurumaru cannot see, but only feel – the barren world where his miniscule existence resides, which is placed somewhere in the center of it.

The scene is a distinct antithesis to the initial one of the film, with the green field and the blue sky, and in that fashion, it elaborately concludes the movie, visually presenting the emotional climax of both “Ran” and of Shakespeare’s “King Lear”.

The scene is also a perfect example of how Kurosawa uses jump cuts, with them moving to a slightly later chronological point in the scene, creating an effect of acceleration and disorientation as they present a constantly shifting world.


5. The scene where Jiro launches an attack to Saburo’s forces

As the attack commences, Saburo’s forces, which are fewer, retreat into the woods. They then start shooting at Jiro’s forces, creating many casualties and disrupting the attack. In the middle of the battle, a messenger arrives to Jiro, informing him that Ayabe is marching toward the First Castle, and Jiro has to retreat in haste.

Kurosawa’s skill in directing a plethora of actors in the same scene found its apogee in “Ran” and this scene is a distinct example. The troops move harmonically, showing their discipline, and the various armies stand apart from each other, due to their coloring that matches the official one of their leaders.

As Kurosawa almost exclusively uses long shots through many static cameras, cutting between them, even the key figures appear irrelevant and the spectator cannot identify with them, but instead functions as a distant observer of the despair caused by war. The magnificent costumes, the makeup inspired by Noh Theatre, and the scenery in general make for a true audiovisual poem, one that makes it hard to believe that it was manufactured during a non-digital era.


6. Costumes fit for an Oscar

The film’s visual prowess owes much to Emi Wada’s costume design, which resulted in 1,400 pieces used in the film, all of which were handmade in Kyoto, in a procedure that lasted three to four months for each one and three years overall.

Their vividness and attention to historical detail is remarkable, both in the robes used in the interiors and the ones in the exteriors, with Kurosawa actually adapting the set in order to highlight them.

The Oscar received by Wada was utterly justified.

Author Bio: Panos Kotzathanasis is a film critic who focuses on the cinema of East Asia. He enjoys films from all genres, although he is a big fan of exploitation. You can follow him on Facebook or Twitter.