Skip to content

The 10 Best Performances in a Paul Thomas Anderson Film

08 February 2016 | Features, Other Lists | by Christopher Sanders-Jolliffe

There Will Be Blood plainview

For a film school drop-out who, in his younger days, was renowned for being something of an egotistical, cocaine addled control freak, Paul Thomas Anderson has cemented himself as a much loved director in the hearts of many. One of the vital elements making his films such high quality is the superb performances he repeatedly elicits from his actors.

But what makes a great performance? Many would argue that the ability to fully engage an audience by taking hold of the character in a real, human way to drive the narrative forward, coupled with a distinctive voice and physical appearance are among the most important prerequisites which make for a ‘great’ performance.

The question becomes more complicated when we ask: what makes a great performance in a Paul Thomas Anderson film? There are so many from which to choose, from Daniel Day Lewis’ Oscar winning turn as Daniel Plainview to Joaquin Phoenix’s performance as sincere hippie Doc Sportello, the options are numerous. Yet there are those performances – including Day Lewis’ Plainview and Phoenix’s Doc – which are particularly outstanding, and are worthy of a special mention.

 

10. Joanna Newsom (Sortilège) – Inherent Vice

Inherent Vice

On her time working with Anderson, Joanna Newsom stated that “the most striking thing was Paul making the decision to confer the narrative voice onto a fringe character. He took these little cues from the book that Sortilège seems sort of mystic and all-seeing in a kind of very unusual, unimposing way, and he just recognised that that was a very convenient place to house the narrative”.

Indeed, placing Newsom in the role of Sortilège was a stroke of genius on the part of Anderson, and the wielding of the role by Newsom is stunning in terms of her delivery of the role and how she functions in the narrative. Admittedly, Newsom does not have as much screen time as other characters, but what is so important about her performance is how she gives clarity to the narrative which might otherwise come across as rather too nebulous for some.

Important to this is the tone of her voice; when discussing her music, people often complain that Newsom’s voice is annoyingly shrill, but this is simply a failure to engage with her properly as both an artist and an actor.

In Inherent Vice, Newsom is captivating through her breathy, childlike narration which guides the audience through the many strange twists the film takes. What is more, her actual performance in front of camera is understated and endearing, carrying off the hippie mystic look perfectly. If anything, it is a shame she is not in front of camera more.

 

9. Phillip Seymour Hoffman (Scotty J.) – Boogie Nights

psh boogie nights

There is so much humour and sadness to the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s Scotty J; with his languid flaxen hair and proclivity for wearing tight, garish shirts, Scotty is singled out in the film as something of a laughing stock, an idea played up to by Hoffman to elicit sympathy for the character. Indeed, throughout Boogie Nights Hoffman works hard to make Scotty endearing through his earnest rendering of his bumbling self-consciousness and sweet adoration of Dirk (Mark Wahlberg) which ends in upset.

Scotty’s longing for Dirk culminates when he forces himself upon Dirk, desperate for him to reciprocate his undying love. This moment of attempted release of repressed sexual urges feels so true to life, so human and honest that it is almost impossible not to love Scotty.

What makes this performance so perfect is Hoffman’s carefully weighted balance of ironic detachment from Scotty, coupled with a sincere attachment to him. As Scotty berates himself for trying to kiss Dirk with his repeated ‘I’m such an idiot’ we are simultaneously invited to laugh at him and feel sympathy for him.

Ironic detachment is a common trope in films deemed ‘postmodern’, so it is refreshing that Hoffman imbues his character with this notion of sincerity in his performance. It is this careful balance Hoffman evokes which puts his turn as Scotty J. firmly in this top 10.

 

8. Paul Dano (Eli/Paul Sunday) – There Will Be Blood

There Will Be Blood

No one can play the role of the sniveling wretch quite like Paul Dano. His turn as Daniel Plainview’s foil Eli Sunday (and, curiously, his performance earlier in the film as Eli’s brother Paul) has won him many admirers.

Originally cast just in the role of Paul Sunday, Paul Dano took on the role when Kel O’Neill dropped out of the film, apparently finding working with Dnaiel Day Lewis too intense. It was a masterstroke on the part of Anderson to put Dano in the role of Eli and Paul, for it intensifies the strange relationship between Eli and Plainview and introduces the idea that Eli and Paul could in fact be the same person.

Dano’s performance is magnificent for the way it captures Eli’s religious fervor with an intense hysterica; particularly memorable are Dano’s maniacal mannerisms as he gyrates and dances during Eli’s sermon, and screaming ‘get out of here ghost! Get out of here ghost!’ in his wretched, screeching voice.

What Dano communicates to the audience is the possibility of reading Eli’s character as an actor himself who just turns up and performs in front of his congregation; a fraud who revels in the ego boosting and potential for financial gain. Towards the end of the film, as Plainview slowly makes it clear that the land Eli thinks can be drilled for oil is worthless, he crumples into a mess, caught in the midst of a crisis of faith.

The way he screws his face, the shrill shriek of his voice and the way he works himself up into hysteria bespeak the quality of his acting and the time spent in character, while also demonstrating that he is quite capable of matching the acting prowess of Oscar winning Day Lewis.

 

7. Gwyneth Paltrow (Clementine) – Hard Eight

HARD EIGHT, (aka SYDNEY), Gwyneth Paltrow, 1996, (c) Rysher Entertainment

Gwyneth Paltrow’s rendering of Clementine – part-time waitress and prostitute – is one of the most empathetic performances on this list. She is naïve of the world, lost and has an air of melancholy to her performance. We feel a great deal of sympathy for Clementine in that brief moment where she assumes Sydney – the aging gambler and paternal figure to both John and Clementine played by Phillip Baker Hall – just wants to sleep with, when in fact he wants to help her.

The naivety which Paltrow brings to Clementine in her performance brings with it a sense of being completely out of control, that she is lost in life no matter how much support she gets from Sydney and John, played by John C. Reilly. One of the film’s most memorable moments comes when Clementine and John hold a man hostage who is unwilling to pay her for sex.

When Sydney arrives to sort out the mess, Paltrow adds depth to Clementine by imbuing her with a childish petulance: “why is he doing that?” she bemoans as Sydney cleans the room for fingerprints. This petulance escalates to hysteria: “this man owes me!” she screams at John.

What is interesting here is how Paltrow contrasts Clementine’s childlike innocence with an adult awareness of the world and an acute sense of justice. It is a stellar performance, for it adds levels of complexity to Clementine which are arguably not present in Reilly’s or Hall’s performances.

 

6. Jeremy Blackman (Stanley Spector) – Magnolia

Jeremy Blackman (Stanley Spector) – Magnolia

The cast list of Magnolia reads like a list of great performances. Singled out amongst behemoths such as Tom Cruise, John C. Reilly, Julianne Moore and Phillip Seymour Hoffman is, of course, Jeremy Blackman who plays the exploited child genius Stanley Spector. Coerced into performing on the children’s quiz show ‘What Do Kids Know?’ by his father, Stanley is arguably at the centre of the film, for the quiz show links the film’s characters in many complex and interweaving ways.

What makes Blackman’s performance so moving is the maturity with which he takes on the role, evoking the idea that Stanley is a child who has been forced to grow up before his years due to his father’s exploitation. What is more, his performance is particularly endearing in the way he evokes anguish as the adults around him exploit him and attempt to corrupt his innocence.

Blackman brings a naïve childlike acceptance of everything the adults around him say, which turns into a distrust and finally a rejection of the quiz show and its exploitative methods. There is also a hint of omniscience in Stanley’s character which Blackman plays up to perfectly.

When Stanley has left the quiz show and has broken into the local library, he acknowledges the rain of frogs with perfect calm. ‘This happens’, he says, ‘this is something that happens’. When all the adults around him are in hysterics during the famous frog sequence, Stanley remains Zen-like, transcending the corrupt adult world around him.

 

 

Pages: 1 2


   

Other Brilliant Movie Posts On The Web
   

Like Our Facebook Page and Get Daily Updates
   
  • Pongthorn Sangthong

    Julianne Moore in boogie nights is one of the most breathtaking performance in P T Anderson film. So sad that you forgot Amy Adams in the Master. And I root for Daniel Day-Lewis. His performance is one of the best Film performance ever. He should be no.1 in this list although I love Joaquin too.

  • Rollyn Stafford

    Great list!

  • lilyboosh

    Tom Cruise and PSH in Magnolia are both great.

  • Le Blanc

    Whoa! Phoenix over DDL! I reckon Day Lewis’ performance in ‘There will be Blood’ was not only one of the greatest in an Anderson movie but one of the greatest ever captured on film.

  • Dimitrije Stojanovic

    List isn’t great. Becouse of
    William H. Macy (Boogie Nights)
    Burt Raynolds (Boogie Nights)
    Juliane Moore (Boogie Nights and Magnolia)
    Marc Wahlberg (Boogie Nights)
    Tom Cruise (Magnolia)

    There is no way that Adam Sandler could be one of the best roles in Anderson’s films. Simply, there is no way.

  • Chrisychipz

    Personally I think Day Lewis’ Daniel Plainview is better than Phoenix’s Freddie Quell, although its only a close second. Two of the best male performances of all time.

  • john in denver

    Phillip Seymour Hoffman appeared in four films and was damn good in all of them. He’s the best. Period.

  • Still D.R.E.

    I have to watch Inherent Vice again I hated it the first 2 times. The kid in Magnolia wasn’t all that what about Tom Cruise and Julianne Moore in that movie What about Wahlberg and Burt Reynolds in Boogie Nights or Philip Seymour Hoffman in Punch Drunk Love man I love that dude’s films..except Inherent Vice.

  • All wrong. Julianne Moore in MAGNOLIA and BOOGIE NIGHTS. Burt Reynolds in BOOGIE NIGHTS. Tom Cruise in MAGNOLIA. Amy Adams in THE MASTER. And Day-Lewis should be #1 with no question for TWBB.

  • Christian Gulldén

    Julianne Moore in Magnolia? Please, that pharmacy scene still makes my heart beat.

  • lex luthor

    Joaquin is the best

  • Special_One

    So happy to see Joaquin at no. 1, was really expecting DDL to be at the top. His performance in The Master is, alongside his own performance in Her and Brando’s in A Streetcar Named Desire, one of the three best performances of all time in my opinion. Needless to say, he is my favorite actor.

    • V.C. Privitera

      Agreed

  • V.C. Privitera

    I remember when Jaoquin Phoenix was announced as the lead-actor for The Master, and while I wasn’t opposed to this choice, as I knew Phoenix is a great actor, but I honestly thought that it would be completely impossible to top what Daniel Day-Lewis did with his portrayal of “Daniel Plainview.” I didn’t even think Anderson could top himself in terms of making a better film than There Will Be Blood.
    That being said, without a doubt: “The Master” is a Masterpiece of Cinema.
    The film is the type of modern-day classic that just hasn’t reached its audience yet…in due time, people will start to appreciate the fullness of its quality & value.
    What truly sets The Master above the mark is the performances from Jaoquin Phoenix as Freddie Quill, Philip Seymour Hoffman as Lancaster Dodd (sadly leaving behind one of, if not his Greatest Performances of his career), Amy Adams also stood out and surprised me with her acting abilities I didn’t seem to notice before…
    Granted this is my own personal opinion as everybody has their own individual taste, but I wholeheartedly agree with the Top 3 Choices as is, so I’m glad the Author is on the same level.
    *******************************
    > Tom Cruise as “Frank T.J. Mackey” in Magnolia should have an ‘Honorable Mention’ and is one of his best performances I always will shut-down the Cruise haters with when they bitch about his acting chops.
    > Philip Baker Hall as Syd in “Hard Eight” would’ve been my choice instead of Paltrow. She did a good job with her role, but Hard Eight wouldn’t be anything without Philip Baker Hall.
    > John C. Reilly as “Reed Rothchild” in Boogie Nights…while there are plenty of great performances from the diverse cast of characters to choose from, for some reason, I can’t help but find Reilly’s take on his character as being so over-the-top with a touch of overacting, that it all stands out and works for the film.
    > Burt Reynolds as “Jack Horner” in Boogie Nights…I don’t think there needs to be any reasoning behind this.
    > William H Macy as “Donnie Smith” in Magnolia…definitely a memorable performance full of depth and wide range of emotions. Macy makes himself so vulnerable, it’s impossible not to take notice.
    *********************************
    — Inherent Vice —
    I don’t know if it’s that my expectations were so high after There Will Be Blood & The Master impressed me so much, but I just can’t seem to get into Inherent Vice.
    I thought not only being a Thomas Pynchon novel, but having the blessing & consent from the author himself for Anderson to make the 1st adaption from Pynchon’s collective works, along with the fantastic cast & crew; How could I not enjoy this film?
    Well…maybe I’m missing something. Maybe since I haven’t read the novel, I’m just not as invested with the characters and plot as much as I should be.
    I get that Anderson integrated & utilized director Robert Altman’s style & technique for this film and that’s clearly obvious, but it’s odd that I wouldn’t get into a film of this caliber, especially since its main character is constantly stoned in and around 1979s Los Angeles….I mean, come on, my all-time favorite film is Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas and being a big fan of Anderson’s and everyone involved; this is why I got side-swiped with not getting into Inherent Vice even a little bit.
    Like I said earlier, this is all a matter of personal taste and opinion, so don’t think I’m being a hater to be a hater.