Skip to content

10 Movies of The 21st Century that Should Have Won The Oscar for Best Cinematography

21 February 2016 | Features, Film Lists | by Alexandra Gandra

best cinematography snubs

At first, in the initial phase of the Academy Awards, the Oscar for “Best Cinematography” was attributed only to cinematographers, followed by the titles of the work for each nominee in the qualifying period of time. This was immediately regarded as an error, and the category was corrected.

In the second year, there wasn’t a single nomination in the category. And in its third year, films were nominated, instead of cinematographers, and the final award didn’t include the cinematographer’s name.

At last, in the fourth year, the modern system was implanted to what it still is today, as the cinematographer is nominated for one film. Following these changes, came the years of color.

In 1936, for its 9th Edition, the pictures and consequent awards were divided by “Black-and-white” and “Color” (although until 1939 the colored pictures were considered “Special Achievement”). 1966 marked the end of that distinction, turning them into one category that included both.

In 2016, nearing the 88th Academy Awards, the nominees are well-known faces in the cinematography world. Among them, Emmanuel Lubezki – the currently favored and winner of the last two “Best Achievement in Cinematography” awards – and Roger Deakins for his 13th nomination, still without a win.

The rest of the category is already a sign that cinematography just gets better and better in film, from Edward Lachman’s entry for “Carol”, three-time Oscar-winner Robert Richardson for “The Hateful Eight” and veteran John Seale for his flashing work in “Mad Max: Fury Road.”

With the array of possibilities and techniques now available to this specific area of filmmaking, by getting inspiration from older, more traditional solutions and merging ideas with some of the greatest directors of our time, the amount of cinematographers that deserve recognition are plentiful.

This list aims to shine a light on some individuals and work they’ve done that was dismissed by Academy voters in past selections for this category.

Often, it was just too hard to choose the best one, and there have been times where the most obvious choice didn’t get the win, but there were also times – a lot of times – where the ones that really deserved the award in a particular year just didn’t get it. From the past 15 years, starting in 2000 and ending in 2015, here are the top 10 films that were somehow wronged.

Note: For a better understanding of each cinematographer’s work, the chosen films are followed by a video regarding that matter, varying from conversations, panels and interviews, to certain scenes in the film that truly stood out.

 

1. The Man Who Wasn’t There – Roger Deakins (74th Academy Awards, 2002)

The Man Who Wasn’t There (2001)

With his most recent nomination for “Sicario” (2015), Deakins has gathered a total of 13 chances for winning the “Best Cinematography” award at the Oscars, without ever having won. He is best known for his 12 collaborations with the Coen brothers – one of them being this 2001 film.

Shot in color and later transferred to black and white adds to the traditional 1949 setting of the story. Deakins then printed on Kodak 5269, a black and white stock designed particularly for film titles. The shots are made mostly at eye level and a long depth of field, lighting is high contrast but low key, adopting the noir style as a film possibly can. Smoke is an important matter, as well.

The main character, played by Billy Bob Thornton, is seen smoking an unfiltered Chesterfield cigarette in almost every scene, making both the rising smoke and the shadows come together to make it look even more classic.

This vastly underrated film won Deakins his second ASC (American Society of Cinematographers) Award, but it wasn’t enough to win the Oscar, losing to “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”.

(Interview with Cinematographer Roger Deakins on Shooting ‘The Man Who Wasn’t There’)

 

2. Far From Heaven – Edward Lachman (75th Academy Awards, 2003)

Far From Heaven

In the light of the recent “Best Achievement in Cinematography” nomination for director Todd Hayne’s film “Carol” (2015) this year, this other film of his failed to get the recognition it deserved in the 2003 ceremony.

The same cinematographer was responsible for both films’ dazzling imagery, but “Far From Heaven” went further. Watching it, one wouldn’t think it was a 2002 film – and that’s just how great of a tribute it was to 1950s pictures, specifically Douglas Sirk melodramas. Lachman gave meaning to each use of color, adapted to each subject of controversy in the film.

This alone deserves its own essay. Creating a saturated “Technicolor” look without digital methods meant that Lachman had to expose the film stocks above the recommended exposure in order to create a dense negative.

Like Sirk’s films, this one portrays the social, racial and sexual issues of post-war America in the most sincere tone, making the spectator fully absorb the cruel reality of such time. Mark Friedberg’s production design is of utter importance to complement Lachman’s cinematography, and they’re both elevated by Mr. Bernstein’s intense music.

The film lost to Conrad Hall’s cinematography in “Road to Perdition,” a posthumous award. While Hall deserved the awards he got for his work in “American Beauty” (1999) and “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” (1969), his last one was seen as more of an homage to his career and his 7 nominations that didn’t get a win. Hall also remains the oldest winner in the category to this day.

(Ed Lachman and Todd Haynes discuss the cinematography of Far from Heaven in Sundance Channel’s ‘Anatomy of a Scene’)

 

3. House of Flying Daggers – Zhao Xiaoding (77th Academy Awards, 2005)

The House of Flying Daggers (2004)

Chinese director Yimou Zhang’s entrance at the 2005 Oscars received only one nomination, and it didn’t win. The Academy granted it a seat among the “Best Cinematography” nominees, and deservingly so. Best described as an exotic visual experience that combines overwhelming action scenes and intense romance, its extraordinary cinematography is full of exquisite imagery and superb special effects.

Despite being regarded by critics as yet another member of the “martial arts” category, this brings another level of spirituality and poetic human emotions to the table. There’s an unspoken lyricism in the unusual camera movements, framing, and editing, as well as its vivid contrasts. Being representative of ancient times (Tang dynasty), the attention to detail is of major importance to make for the perfect replica of that time.

One could say the director builds the minimal story around its visuals, strengthening dramatic effect and using color and peculiar composition to bring out the desired feel.

The cinematography is, all in all, incomparable. Yet it lost to a more obvious choice, “The Aviator” (2004), which was criticized for its “could be better” CG. Being a Martin Scorsese film, other things were of bigger value, but the Academy allowed it to sweep 5 of the 11 categories it was nominated for.

(The Bamboo forest fight in “House of Flying Daggers”)

 

4. Good Night, and Good Luck. – Robert Elswit (78th Academy Awards, 2006)

goodnight-and-good-luck

Elswit, a common collaborator of the director of this film (George Clooney), is a big fan of analog and usually refuses to work with digital cameras. “Good Night,” a historical drama portraying the conflict between radio and TV journalist Edward R. Murrow and U.S. Senator of Wisconsin Joseph McCarthy, mostly regarding the Senator’s anti-Communist actions.

Similar to other projects with the same approach represented on this list, it was filmed on color film stock on a greyscale set, later being corrected and transferred to black and white in post-production. Overall, this was a hard film to get made. Clooney had to mortgage his own house just to get it done, and so a lot of the production process was also restricted.

Most scenes, such as the ones representing CBS offices and studios, were all sets on a soundstage. When it came to the choice of color and direction for the cinematography, it was decided when Clooney and producer Grant Heslov settled for archival footage to depict the Senator.

It being in black and white, the color scheme was meant to blend with it. The harmony created in the shades between bright lights and shadows, the peculiar close-ups and reverse zooms, make it a fantastic-looking reel.

Elswit eventually won an Oscar two years later for the film “There Will Be Blood,” which has been called a solution for voting members that weren’t able to decide between the two films in the category that were cinematographed by Roger Deakins.

However, in the 2006 ceremony, Elswit lost to Dion Beebe for “Memoirs of a Geisha.” Perhaps it would’ve been better to give this one to him instead.

(The two excerpts of Ed Murrow’s 1958 speech that are included in “Good Night, and Good Luck.” performed by David Strathairn.)

 

5. The Dark Knight – Wally Pfister (81st Academy Awards, 2009)

Joker-Batman-Behind-Scenes-the-dark-knight

Pfister and director Christopher Nolan – usual collaborators – did something particularly special in this film, which was the use of IMAX 70mm cameras to film four major sequences having in mind its release in IMAX theaters, making it the first time they had been used to partially shoot a feature film.

This brought tremendous issues to production, having in mind that the cameras were larger and far heavier than standard ones, made a lot of noise while recording, had short film loads (from 30 secs to 2 minutes only) and its film stocks cost way more than standard 35mm ones.

The cinematographer got inspired by Chicago and London’s urban textures, and searched for a realistic tone, keeping the lighting natural. As Pfister said regarding going digital, “Film just gives you so much more latitude than digital cameras have.

IMAX, on the other hand, has a physical impact that is really unparalleled. Chris and I have always felt – and been able to prove! – that IMAX is an immersive format which is endless, and has much more impact than three dimensions or stereoscopic.”

What is still considered one of the best films of the 2000s, as well as one of the best superheroes film ever, was nominated for 8 Oscars at the 81st Academy Awards.

It won two, for Achievement in Sound Editing and for Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role – posthumously attributed to Heath Ledger. However, that was the year of “Slumdog Millionaire,” which took home Best Picture, Best Director and 6 other awards including “Best Cinematography.”

(Wally Pfister talks about working with director Christopher Nolan on “The Dark Knight”)

 

 

Pages: 1 2


   

Other Brilliant Movie Posts On The Web
   

Like Our Facebook Page and Get Daily Updates
   
  • Samantha Bryans

    Roger Deakins for Skyfall, absolutely. However, I disagree on Tree of Life, while it was a beautifully shot film, I think Janusz Kaminski should’ve won for War Horse that year.

  • Brandon Thompson

    I think the late Andrew Lesnie deserved an award for LotR but i’m surprised he wasn’t nominated for The Two Towers and Return of the King

  • Adam Jones

    Life of Pi > Skyfall
    Synecdoche New York, Slumdog Millionaire and Benjamin Button > Dark Knight
    The Tree of Life and The Man Who Wasn’t There are great picks, though

  • Laura R

    What, no “Children of Men”?

  • Vijay Kumar

    The Artist,Prisoner’s Inside LLewyn Davis

  • Roger Deakins is the most underrated cinematographer of last 20 years. Genius. Look at this: https://vimeo.com/94774085

    • Claudiu Petrescu

      Deakins is the most talked about cinematographer in the world, along with Lubeszki. What would you actually want to happen in order for you to reconsider whether the word “underrated” has its place ? But I;m just saying I find this funny… not that I don’t looove his work or character as a person in general.

      • I wasn’t precise enought. I wrote “Underrated”, I meant “without Oscar” 🙂 I thought about Oscars-underrating (If I can say that) because major text is about cinematography achievements without oscars.

      • Xanian

        He should have had at least one Oscar.
        Just look at the resume this man has got.
        Fargo (1996)
        The Big Lebowski (1998)
        O Brother, Where Art Thou (2000)
        The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (2007)
        No Country For Old Men (2007)
        Skyfall (2012)
        Prisoners (2013)

        Lubezki is a brilliant cinematographer, don’t get me wrong. But I subscribe to the view that the camera shouldn’t be a part of the gimmicks like Lubezki IMO is guilty of doing so often. But Deakins genius not being recognized by an academy of people for whom film is a livelihood simply shows an appalling tendency to be swayed by showmanship over steady, unflinching brilliance.

  • Hal Jordan

    Skyfall and The Dark Knight are the blockbusters with better cinematography that I ever seen.

  • mckracken

    tree of life is extremely kitschy. All those glossy, overdone contrast and perfectly framed shots are quite ugly, in my opinion.

  • Scott K.

    Roger Deakins shares his 13 nominations without a win with George Folsey, longtime MGM master cinematographer. Sicario is very deserving of an Oscar, though it looks like it will go to Chivo for his unprecedented third in a row.

  • Scott K.

    OK, here’s a couple left out: Amelie and Chicago. Chicago in particular was one of the finest mergers of theatrical lighting and cinematography, and though eventual Oscar winner Dion Beebe is the credited Director of Photography (and was nominated), the musical numbers were lit by the theatrical lighting design team of Jules Fisher and Peggy Eisenhauer. Though Chicago won Best Picture and five other Oscars, Rob Marshall lost the Best Director Oscar to Roman Polanski (The Pianist).

  • Hariharan Acharya

    Road to Perdition deserved the Oscar for Cinematography. I don’t think that it was a homage or something.

  • Ted Wolf

    Skyfall has to be the most beautifully photographed Bond movie since the swinging 60’s.