Skip to content

 

8 Movies That Prove Robert Pattinson Is A Good Actor

28 November 2017 | Features, Film Lists | by Justin Gunterman

4. Cosmopolis

Cosmopolis (2012)

David Cronenberg’s first collaboration with Robert Pattinson was met with a collective shrug from critics and an even worse reception from audiences. The general consensus was that the source material was more or less unadaptable, which resulted in a movie that felt dry and repetitive.

Though some people enjoyed the psychological complexity, most people found the movie to be too much buildup for not enough payoff. The only thing that seemed to consistently earn praise was Robert Pattinson’s deadpan performance as the wealthy pretty boy who decides to take a lengthy car ride in the city.

Whenever the dialogue stalls, Pattinson comes along and livens things up. Whenever the plot feels like it’s going nowhere, Pattinson gives people a reason to keep watching. He’s just as cold as the rest of the movie, but that’s what makes him so fascinating. The self-loathing billionaire is made delightfully hateable thanks to Pattinson’s chilly performance.

Although he has a tendency to come across as flat-out emotionless, his portrayal of the character is actually far more nuanced than one may initially believe. There’s an obvious difference between his legitimately emotionless performance in Twilight and his performance in Cosmopolis. Cronenberg intended to make a bleak movie, and Pattinson was right for the job.

 

3. The Lost City of Z

The Lost City of Z

The Lost City of Z was a box office misfire, which is a shame considering the fact that it’s actually an excellent movie. The true story of a British explorer who disappears after trying to find a lost city is just fascinating enough to work despite a few flaws. Though occasionally too formulaic for its own good, there are enough positive aspects to outweigh the feelings of familiarity. The visuals are stunning, the deliberate pacing advances the story in all the right ways, and the top-billed cast members all show some serious acting chops.

In other words, Charlie Hunnam and Robert Pattinson show some serious acting chops. For being the third choice after Brad Pitt and Benedict Cumberbatch, Hunnam makes quite a strong case for himself as the stubbornly determined adventurer who just can’t call it quits. Meanwhile, Pattinson essentially plays the anthesis of the protagonist.

As partner-in-crime Corporal Henry Costin, he presents us with a character who is level-headed and wise. He’s dedicated to helping figure out the mystery, but he’s also realistic about the dangers that stand in the way. Pattinson’s take on the character works perfectly alongside Hunnam, which is probably why it’s so easy to praise.

To be fair, most of the movie is worthy of praise. This is a severely underrated film that could have benefited from a better release date and a stronger ad campaign. Luckily, it’s finally available for streaming, which means anyone who missed it the first time can give it a look.

Specifically, anyone needing a Pattinson fix will find that The Lost City of Z more than does the trick. Although he is (once again) given a supporting role, his role still has a strong impact on the overall movie. It’s a relief that such a fascinating character gets to be played by such a strong actor.

 

2. Life (2015)

Life (2015)

Not to be confused with the surprisingly awesome Alien knock-off from this year, 2015’s Life is actually about the relationship between acclaimed actor James Dean and photographer Dennis Stock. Considering the fact that the script is ultimately a bit of a disappointment, the film instead has to rely on its two leads in order to succeed.

Dane DeHaan takes on the role of Dean while Pattinson plays Stock, and they both do an excellent job. Although they aren’t given the greatest dialogue to work with, they both make do with what’s given to them and deliver downright hypnotic performances. The fact that they’re both able to carry the film is a testament to their talent.

In theory, James Dean should be the center of attention considering the world’s intense fascination with the late actor. Somehow, Pattinson is able to draw attention to himself like a magnet. Dennis Stock isn’t a particularly interesting character due to an unfortunate lack of exposition within the script, but Pattinson gives a nuanced performance that practically forces viewers to remain engaged. His performance isn’t showy or loud by any means.

Rather, it’s effective due to the subtle emotional depth found within each and every line he delivers. The script doesn’t give us enough background into the famous photographer, so Pattinson makes it his mission to fill in the blanks.

Life is an above average movie solely because of the two lead actors. DeHaan gives us a James Dean who’s as unique as he is engaging, but he’d be nothing without his spectacular costar. The chemistry between the two actors is laudable, but Pattinson even manages to command the screen when he’s not interacting with DeHaan. In other words, he’s constantly successful in his attempts to draw the audience away from the film’s unfortunate flaws. The movie is never as fascinating as it should be, but it least has the advantage of featuring Pattinson at his very best.

 

1. Good Time

Those who have seen Good Time should have seen this coming from a mile away. Along with being Pattinson’s best overall performance, this is also one of the best performances of the year from one of the best films of the year.

To say that this is a career high is an understatement. Pattinson’s work in Good Time eclipses all of his other performances, and it’s not even because his other performances are remotely bad. On the contrary, Pattinson had built up quite the reputation prior to his work in Good Time. This was just the movie that cemented his status as an acting powerhouse who’s anything but a sparkling vampire.

Good Time revolves around Connie Nikas (Pattinson), a small-time criminal who attempts to rob a prominent bank with his developmentally disabled brother. Following an unfortunate run-in with the law, his brother is taken into custody where he’ll stay put unless Connie can come up with tens of thousands of dollars to pay the bail. It’s a story that’s simultaneously touching and balls-to-the-walls bonkers once everything starts piling up. It’s fair to assume that the endlessly entertaining script worked to Pattinson’s advantage, but it would be naive to believe the writing is doing all the heavy lifting.

His commitment to this character is evident from the opening scene. Once he spits out his first line of dialogue with an emotionally charged New York accent, you know you’re in for a (excuse the pun) good time. Connie Nikas is sort of a scumbag. He’s selfish, lazy, and emotionally manipulative.

Despite all of this, Pattinson somehow makes him a likeable person. He still presents the character as a flawed criminal, but he also makes us feel for the character. Once again, it’s not the script that has this effect on the audience – it’s the actor. Good Time is a movie with so many great attributes (including the aforementioned script), but at the end of the day, it’s Pattinson who is able to charm moviegoers and leave them breathless.

Author Bio: Justin is a paraprofessional teaching assistant and full-time film enthusiast with a degree in English. When he’s not writing about films, he’s probably watching them in his spare time.

 

 

Pages: 1 2


   

Other Brilliant Movie Posts On The Web
   

Like Our Facebook Page and Get Daily Updates
   
  • Cosmopolis? Ugh…. that movie fucking sucked. I love David Cronenberg but that was his worst film. It was just fucking dull. Everyone looked like they were on Ritalin or something as they all sounded robotic. I hated that film and it pains me to say that since I’m a fan of Cronenberg. Maps to the Stars was a film I did like as I though Pattinson was excellent in that.

    It’s good to see that he and Kristen Stewart are making interesting films while that werewolf boy is just trying too hard only to prove to everyone that he can’t act for shit.

    • It was very true to the source material – your gripe is probably more with Don DeLillo.
      I dug the film but get why most don’t

  • Anyone who pays any attention to what I have to say about films (which is not many, if any people) know that I’ve been heralding Pattinson as a great – not “good” – actor for a few years now, and have mentioned so in several ToC comments.

  • shamim ahmed

    The Rover is criminally underrated , so is James Pattinson’s performance

    • Personally not a huge fan of the movie – it’s alright – but agree that not enough people talk about James(?) performance in it

      • shamim ahmed

        I am not saying that the movie was a masterpiece but given the hype awful movies get these days, it deserved some love,.

  • Rublev

    He is very good in Good Time

  • nicoal

    The Twilight movies may be bad, but he wasn’t a bad actor. Kind of unfair to judge him on the cheesy films he ended up being in when he was younger.

    • Gimme that $$$ and I’ll make infinite Twilights. People need to relax on judging actors for taking paydays – especially early in their careers. This dude has enough fame and cash to do boring, safe projects, and he’s consistently pushing himself.
      Also, I can’t imagine he made much off movies like Rover and Good Time